Resilience is a highly desirable quality, even though the term is at risk of becoming a cliché. It describes the ability of individuals and organisations to maintain, or regain, their required level of functioning despite significant stressors.
The two elements of resilience, maintaining and regaining function, are beautifully illustrated by the Maori proverb: ‘do not die like an octopus. Die like a hammerhead shark’.
The hammerhead shark has fierce determination and will maintain its defensive efforts to the bitter end. It is tough. The octopus, on the other hand, adapts to its environment, then quickly regains its original structure when danger passes.
Octopi have fantastic flexibility – their beaks are the only part they cannot contort. They have been filmed squeezing through spaces barely the width of a coin. They are also highly intelligent, as illustrated by the adventures of Inky the octopus who successfully escaped from a New Zealand aquarium in 2016 in a puff of magical black ink.
The analogy of the octopus and hammerhead shark applies to resilience in healthcare. However, we must guard against the seductive overtures of superhero rhetoric and recognise the sham of commodified, ‘fake’ resilience.
There are five important ways in which fake resilience is different from true resilience. They are:
Recognition and respect
Healthcare organisations and leaders that truly value resilience only rely on it when it is truly necessary. They can discern when their team members draw on their resilience to meet challenges, acknowledge the contributions, and strive to quickly resolve the stressors.
A truly resilient healthcare system treats resilience with respect. Senior leaders understand that it requires much effort, sacrifice, and often comes at a personal cost for individuals and systems. Just because team members are resilient, and able to cope with additional stress, does not mean this precious resource should routinely be exploited. Resilience must not be relied on to meet organizational KPIs, but kept in reserve for exceptional events, like the COVID-19 pandemic.
The proponents of fake resilience purposefully conflate resilience with outcomes. According to them, positive outcomes are associated with strong resilience, while individuals or organisations who are unable to overcome a challenge is deficient in resilience. In fact, even the most resilient individual or organization must eventually succumb before an overwhelming and relentless onslaught of stressors.
Responsibilities and resources
A truly resilient healthcare system takes responsibility for its staff and systems by allocating sufficient resources and providing training and support. Resilience is not an accidental byproduct, nor a platitude of mindfulness and positive thoughts. Instead, resilience becomes a conscious pursuit through exercise and rehearsals, and it is actively restored once the stressors have been dealt with.
Reflection and reconfiguration
The third way to different true resilience from fake resilience, is to examine the response once the stressors have been dealt with. Leaders and organisations that value true resilience learn from events and implement changes that will help them better respond in future. They are not simply content to regain their previous functioning but aspire to grow through and from adversity and achieve higher levels of functioning and more robust structures.
In Tuesday’s with Morrie we read: ‘Give love, receive love and grow from the painful memories of yesterday. No one emerges from a battle unchanged – it is the battles that define who we are.’ True resilience means learning from the past and improving despite adversity.
Reward and recovery
Senior leaders and organisations that truly value resilience recognizes, rewards, and restores it. After the devastating earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand, on 22 February 2010, the following reflections were offered: ‘Earthquakes are inevitable in New Zealand, but earthquake disasters are not. We should be aiming to invest in measures that ensure buildings and infrastructure are stronger, not just to prevent loss of life, but to enable them to function as soon as possible after the ground had stopped shaking.’
The authors observe that the cost of enhancing resilience is a fraction of the economic and social costs of a decade of demolition and rebuilding. When this principle is applied to healthcare, it becomes self-evident why staff ‘need to be given time, space and resources to recover, which might include adequate breaks and time off following intense periods’.
In Tuesday’s with Morrie, the professor offers this observation during the final days of his life: ‘the fact is, there is no foundation, no secure ground, upon which people may stand today if it isn’t the family. If you don’t have the support and love and caring and concern that you get from a family, you don’t have much at all.’
This sentiment is beautifully expressed by the Maori answer to the question about the most important thing in the world: ‘It is the people, it is the people, it is the people’.
As we pause and reflect on how far we have come on the COVID-19 pandemic journey, and as we prepare for the next steps on the way, let us also take a few moments to recognize and celebrate true resilience!
Alternative animal analogies for resilience
Dr Carl de Wet
Clinical Lead, Gold Coast Primary Health Network
Qld Health have advised that the following factsheets have been updated and published to reflect the current public health advice and level of response. Coronavirus (COVID-19) HCD factsheet link COVID-19 CDCG A-Z factsheet link
The Gold Coast Health (GCH) COVID Virtual Ward has closed. Patients should be managed in general practice where possible. Acutely unwell patients should be referred to the Emergency Department. Refer stable patients who are eligible for injectable COVID therapies to GCH using the template here. We w...
Update from Dr Roger Halliwell – Chair of Gold Coast Primary Health Network (GCPHN) Board I attended the GP Crisis Summit in Canberra on 5 October, hosted by RACGP, with participation from many organisations involved in the primary care sector. With only 13.8% of medical graduates considering ...
CSIRO’s Australian e-Health Research Centre is working with Healthdirect Australia and the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, to conduct an independent evaluation of the Living with COVID Program. They would like to hear about the experiences of General Practitioners (GPs) providing...